Submited on: 11 Oct 2011 07:13:21 AM GMT
Published on: 11 Oct 2011 04:31:05 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Nil.

  • Competing interests:
    Nil.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Nil.

  • How to cite:  Perla S B.Formalin Effects on the Nose and Throat of Pesonnel of Anatomical Sciences in Iran Medical Schools[Review of the article 'Formalin Effects on the Nose and Throat of Personnel of Anatomical Sciences Departments in Iran Medical Schools ' by Namavar M].WebmedCentral 2011;3(2):WMCRW001480
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Partly
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This paper definitely need language editing to increase the flow and coherence of sentences and paragraphs.

     

  • Competing interests:
    I am a colleague of the author and working in the same department.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I do not have any experience in this area as a researcher but has frequently been exposed to formalin in anatomy dissection room as an anatomist.

  • How to cite:  Azari H .Formalin Effects on the Nose and Throat of Personnel of Anatomical Sciences Departments in Iran Medical Schools[Review of the article 'Formalin Effects on the Nose and Throat of Personnel of Anatomical Sciences Departments in Iran Medical Schools ' by Namavar M].WebmedCentral 2011;2(12):WMCRW001220
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Partly
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? No
  • Other Comments:

    The paper is depending on subjective symtoms and using inadequate scientific methods

    The introduction & dicussion are written in a poor languge with unclear references.

    The whole paper requires a total modification to be accepted

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    Effect of formaldehyde on the ultrastructure of goblet cells in tracheal epithelium of guinea pig (with others) Zagazig University Medical Journal ; Apr 2009, Vol 15 (2) : 224-236
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I have been a supervisor of an MD thesis on 1995 studying the Effect of Formalin on bronchial epithelium og guinea pig , using light and electron microscopy

     

  • How to cite:  Hassanein G H.Formalin Effects on the Nose and Throat of Personnel of Anatomical Sciences Departments in Iran Medical Schools [Review of the article 'Formalin Effects on the Nose and Throat of Personnel of Anatomical Sciences Departments in Iran Medical Schools ' by Namavar M].WebmedCentral 2011;2(12):WMCRW001210
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Formalin effect on the nose and . . .
Posted by Dr. Abbas Piryaee on 29 Nov 2011 12:29:55 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    the article is good.

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am anatomist

  • How to cite:  Piryaee A .Formalin effect on the nose and . . .[Review of the article 'Formalin Effects on the Nose and Throat of Personnel of Anatomical Sciences Departments in Iran Medical Schools ' by Namavar M].WebmedCentral 2011;2(11):WMCRW001175
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The references did not clear in the text.

    Questionaires should be added to the text

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I have not any research experience in this field.

  • How to cite:  Bayat M .Formalin Effects on the Nose and Throat of Personnel of Anatomical Sciences Departments in Iran Medical Schools [Review of the article 'Formalin Effects on the Nose and Throat of Personnel of Anatomical Sciences Departments in Iran Medical Schools ' by Namavar M].WebmedCentral 2011;2(10):WMCRW001052
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse