WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Submited on: 24 Nov 2011 09:39:56 AM GMT

Published on: 24 Nov 2011 08:12:51 PM GMT

Posted by Dr. Thomas Herchline on 28 Nov 2011 04:48:33 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	No
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
This is the decsription of a proposed study.

The methods and aims of the study are reasonable.

The authors should label the additional files with descriptive names (eg, "Data extraction form" for additional file 4).
Competing interests:
None
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
Yes
References:
http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/40/2/246.long
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

Medical Director, Public Health - Dayton & Montgomery County
How to cite: Herchline T .Protocol for a Systematic Review of Bacillus Calmette- Guerin (BCG) Revaccination[Review of the article 'Protocol for a Systematic Review : Bacillus Calmette- Guerin (BCG) Revaccination and Protection Against Tuberculosis ' by Ahmad N].WebmedCentral 2011;2(11):WMCRW001169

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse