Submited on: 26 Sep 2011 09:26:10 AM GMT
Published on: 26 Sep 2011 02:55:18 PM GMT

Comment for 5: The structure and length of this paper is relatively unsatisfacory. This subject is very important and needs very scholarship authors' sights. When Moore's book is considered, the length of paper is very short. However, all the data about both embryologic and Quran' verses are generally concordant when compared 2 other faithful sources about Quran and 3 sources about Embryology and organization of paper due to embryologic developmental progression is well. But it must be noticed that the interpretation of all verses in Quran must be made by Scholar scientist because some important points can be  interpreted incomplete and also by mistake. So when this paper was prepared at least one author of Quran' sights should be considered and he should be cited in paper' anywhere.
 Comment for 6 and 7: In page 4 of 9 in right column at second paragraph it was written that " The stage of Alaqa starts on the 15th day and ends of the 23rd or 24th day....". On the other hand, in upper paragraph "Alaqa was referred as a leech or bloodsucker" and also attachment and implantation of embryo to womb. In this situation if Alaqa refers to leech the written paragraph is true. However, if Alaqa refers to attachment and implantation of embryo to endometrium the days which were given must be changed to 9th  and 12th day. In fact Alaqa generally refers to that implantation process. On the other hand 14th-15th days are very important for embryo because primary stem villi which are the first active embryonic blood stream was formed. Yet, primitive villus formations (priamary, secondary and tertiary villi) is ended at 24th - 25th days and it is concordant with the beginning of mudhga phase. In this point, it should be discussed whether Alaqa refers to leech, implantation or primary stem cell villi formation between authors. My opinion is the last one but it must be discussed well by different scientist and Religion scholars.
In page 5 of 9 in right column at 3rd paragraph it was written that "Many Muslim scholars, upon reliance on Prophetic traditions conclude that, the first 120 days cover three 40 day stages;...".The hadiths which was accepted as Prophet' words were conveyed to people which were lived after Prophet was die, by different Muslim scholars such as al-Baghdadi. However, at the present days, it was accepted that many of hadith was changed by mistake or conveyed with scholars' interpretation and the number of faithful hadith which described as Sahih Hadith  was decreased. On the other hand Quran is words of Allah and accepted as unchanged since it was sent. So Quran verses and interpretations is more confidential than hadith. In this paragraph it was noticed that embryogenesis is ended after 120 days which was described as end of mudghah, covering of bones with flesh. But sclerotome and myotome begin to form when somites are formed and end at 40th-45th days. Also all embryologic development is ended at the end of 58th day as known. Although these data are conflicted it should be considered that these informations were taken from humans and it may be unsafe. So in my opinion this paragraph should be removed from paper to protect misunderstandings.
In the page 7 of 9 at the end of left column a verse of The Holy Quran (31:14) was considered. Although in this verse "And in two years was his weaning" was interpreted as incubation time, my opinion is this verse may use to recommendation of weaning time for mothers.
In the page 7 of 9  in right column at second paragraph it was written as an interpretation of one of verse of Holy Quran (76:2) "Verily We created man from a drop of a mingled fluid-drop (utfa amshaj), in order to try him: so We...". In this verse when compared with  Turkish sources of translating of Quran" in order to try" is not enough to describe what We said. Because other sources I investigated are conceived that  as "because we will examine him". But it should be considered that translations of The Holy Quran in different  languages can different from each other.

  • competing interests: No
  • Invited by the author to make a review on this article? :
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Embryology

  • Publications in the same or a related area of science: No
  • References: None
 
Report abuse