1)The article mentions study of 10 -10 patients each in the abstract and later contradicts it by mentioning 20 patients in Gonococcal Urethritis group, 10 in NGU group.
2)We already have a single dose therapy from Quinolones for the same condition then what motivated for a drug with longer duration of therapy from the same group.
3)Laboratory parameters are vague and not elucidated.
4) NO statistical data for comparison has been submitted.
5)References have been submitted at the end.
6)Some references do not include the journal name.
6) Some references are NOT TRACEABLE.
7) The written language and grammar needs considerable RE-WRITING.
competing interests: NONE
Invited by the author to make a review on this article? :
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
None
Publications in the same or a related area of science: Yes
1)The article mentions study of 10 -10 patients each in the abstract and later contradicts it by mentioning 20 patients in Gonococcal Urethritis group, 10 in NGU group.
2)We already have a single dose therapy from Quinolones for the same condition then what motivated for a drug with longer duration of therapy from the same group.
3)Laboratory parameters are vague and not elucidated.
4) NO statistical data for comparison has been submitted.
5)References have been submitted at the end.
6)Some references do not include the journal name.
6) Some references are NOT TRACEABLE.
7) The written language and grammar needs considerable RE-WRITING.