Systematic Review
 

By Dr. Martina Caputo , Dr. Cecilia Di Luzio , Dr. Amelia Bellisario , Dr. Maria Luisa Favale , Mrs. Francesca Squillace
Corresponding Author Dr. Martina Caputo
Dept of Oral and Maxillo Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, - Italy
Submitting Author Dr. Martina Caputo
Other Authors Dr. Cecilia Di Luzio
Dept of oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, - Italy

Dr. Amelia Bellisario
Dept of Oral and Maxillo Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, - Italy

Dr. Maria Luisa Favale
Dept of Oral and Maxillo Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, - Italy

Mrs. Francesca Squillace
Dept od Oral and Maxillo Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, - Italy

ORTHODONTICS

[apert syndrome], [orthodontic], [craniosynostosis], [midface hypoplasia].

Caputo M, Di Luzio C, Bellisario A, Favale M, Squillace F. Orthopedic and orthodontic features in patients with Apert syndrome: review of literature. WebmedCentral ORTHODONTICS 2017;8(11):WMC005355

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
No
Submitted on: 28 Oct 2017 09:17:37 PM GMT
Published on: 08 Nov 2017 05:49:55 AM GMT

Abstract


In the PubMed accessible literature, studies about maxillo-facial features of Apert Syndrome and about its interdisciplinary orthodontic and surgical treatment is rare. Apert's syndrome is a malformation characterized by craniosynostosis, midface hypoplasia, ocular manifestations (hypertelorism) and syndactyly of the hands and feet. These craniofacial characteristics predispose the patient to sagittal hypoplasia of the maxilla with concomitant anterior open bite (skeletal and dental) dental crowding, a pseudocleft palate. The best way to treat this pathology is using a combined approach both orthodontic and surgical. In our review of literature we want to investigate about most common orthopedic and orthodontic alterations of these patients, in order to understand which of these are most common and to evidence that the management of Apert syndrome patients include a multidisciplinary approach involving orthodontists, neurosurgeons, plastic surgeons, ophthalmologists.

Background


Apert's Syndrome, described for the first time by Eugene Apert, is a rare disease characterized by a dominant autosomal inheritance. [1]

It is characterized by craniosinostosis, bilateral syndactyly of hands and feet, and maxillo-facial alterations as by hypertelorism, proptosis, acrocephaly or brachicephaly, short and flattened nose with a decreased nasolabial angle. [2]

In the oral cavity it is possible to observe an ogival palate, maxillary transverse and sagittal hypoplasia, dental crowding, eruptive delay, ectopic position of the teeth. Even though it could seem evident a pseudoprognathism, Mandibula is usually of normal size. Abnormalities to the nervous, gastrointestinal and urogenital systems are rare as a compromission of cardiac and respiratory system, although upper respiratory tract infections, sleep apnea, and malnutrition can be seen. [3]

The mandibular prognathism is the result of the midface hypoplasia due to a retraction of the third medium of the face, where as lips assume usually a trapezoid configuration. [4-5] The palate is arched with bilateral swelling of the palatine processes called "pseudocleft palate", although it could be present a true cleft palate. [6]

Anterior open bite, severe crowding and maxilla hypoplasia are the most frequent dentofacial alterations associated to Apert Syndrome. Therefore, skeletal class III is not the result of a prognathic mandibula, but is due to an alterated sagittal development of the jaw. [6-7]

Dental anomalies include delayed and ectopic eruption, bladder incisors, crowding of teeth, especially in open bite, bilateral crossbite, mandibular prognathism and midline deviations [8].

Matherial and Methods


Therefore, the purpose of this review is to show to the orthodontists and to maxillo-facial surgeons the alterated cephalometric and dentofacial parameters of this class of patients analyzing literature between 2000 to 2016. The systematic review of literature has been performed on the principal medical databases: PubMed (Medline).

Our aim was to investigate the literature up to now regarding the Apert syndrome and to analyze some parameters emerging from each single study, finally comparing them with each other.

Keywords used were : [apert syndrome], [orthodontic], [craniosynostosis], [midface hypoplasia].

Many articles published about Apert Syndrome are case reports, so we want to identify, for each of them, orthodontic alterations.

Review


In 2000, Rynearson [6] described a case of a 21-year-old caucasian woman, in good health, but with typical skeletal alterations of Apert's syndrome: hypertelorism, prominent frontal skeleton and third-rate hypoplasia. It was an increase in the length of the face, ectopic teeth, anterior open bite , poor oral hygiene, severe discrepancies about the arch length. The maxilla was hypoplasic with a V shaped arched palate. There was also a deviation of the median line.

In 2007, Hohoff [9] described three cases of patients with Apert syndrome. In all three patients the same features were highlighted: hypertelorism, excess of the lower third of the face, a trapezoid upper lip, delayed eruption with dental crowding and a pseudoprognathism, open bites with monolateral crossbite .

In 2010, Verdonck [10] described a 14-year-old woman with Apert syndrome, pointing to the presence of maxillary facial flattening of the nasal bridge, prominent frontal skeleton, maxillary hypoplasia with mid-third retraction of the face, pseudoprognathism accompanied by an anterior open bite and unilateral crossbite. The oral hygiene of the patient was good. The palate, on the other hand, showed the arched shape to V with two bilateral swellings of palatine processes.

Benmilaud [11], in 2013, studied a 10-year-old child with Apert syndrome. No parameters other than those previously reported by other authors have reported apart from the presence of mental retardation and cleft palate with bifid uvula.

Also in 2013, Bhatia [12] treated other clinical case of a 14-year-old boy with Apert syndrome who further confirmed the presence of the same altered parameters.

In 2014 Kumar [13] and in 2016 Koca [14], they still described two clinical cases of two patients with Apert syndrome and again the parameters found were the same.

An overview of maxillo-facial features in patients affected by Apert Syndrome were presented in Table 1.

(Table 1: Overview of orthopedic, orthodontic and systemic alterations in patients with Apert syndrome in the cases reported in the literature from 2000 to 2016.)

.

2000 Rynearson

2007

Hohoff (1° case)

2007 Hohoff (2° case)

2007 Hohoff (3° case)

2010

Verdonck

2013

Benmilaud

2013

Bhatia

2014

Kumar

2016

Koca

Acrocephaly/Brachicephaly

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Flattened occipital bone

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Prominent frontal bone

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Proptosis and hypertelorism

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cardiac or respiratory alterations

No

No

No

No 

No

No

No

No

No

Flattened nose

No

No

No

No 

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Midface hypoplasia

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Increased lenght of the face

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Pseudoprognathism/III class

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Dental crowding

Yes

Yes

Yes

No 

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Ectopic eruptions

Yes

No

No

No 

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Delayed eruptions

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

Yes

No

Anterior open bite

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Monolateral crossbite

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

V-shaped arched palate/pseudocleft palate

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Poor oral hygiene

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

No

Yes

No

Trapezoid upper lip

No

Yes

No

No

Yes

No

No

Yes

No

Syndactily

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Mental retardations

No

No

No 

No

No

Yes

No

No

No

Conclusions


Concluding, the maxillo-facial alterations that we can find most frequently in patients with Apert syndrome were: hypertelorism and proptosis, occiput flattening, projection of the frontal skeleton, flat nasal bridge. In the orthodontic area, the most obvious signs were the presence of anterior skeletal and dental open bite, midface hypoplasia, delayed dentition and dental crowding, monolateral cross bite, V-shaped arched palate (only one case in our review shows cleftpalate with bifid uvula). Heart and respiratory disturbances weren't compromised in the analysis of case reports of our review. Rare cases of mental retardation were present.

In the approach to this class of patients, the aim of the specialists was to provide the patient with a more acceptable face and occlusion outcome obtainable exclusively through a combined orthodontic / surgical approach.

References


DeGiovanni CV, Jong C, Woollons A. What syndrome is this? Apert syndrome. Pediatr Dermatol. 2007;24:186-8.

Bhatia PV, Patel PS, Jani YV, Soni NC. Apert's syndrome:Report of a rare case. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2013;17:294-7.

Batra P, Duggal R, Parkash H. Dentofacial characteristics in Apert syndrome: a case report. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2002 Sep;20(3):118-23.

Paravatty RP, Ahsan A, Sebastian BT, Pai KM, Dayal PK. Apert syndrome: A case report with discussion of craniofacial features. Quintessence Int. 1999;30:423-6.

Amar T, Krishna V, Sona K. Apert syndrome: A rare presentation. J Indian Acad Clin Med. 2007;8:245-6.

Rynearson RD. Case report: Orthodontic and dentofacial orthopedic considerations in Apert's syndrome. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:247-52

Pereira V, Sacher P, Ryan M, Hayward R. Dysphagia and nutrition problems in infants with Apert syndrome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009;46:285-91.

Punwani DV, Purohit V, Irani SF, Kumta NB. Apert's syndrome: A type of acrocephalosyndactyly (A case report) J Postgrad Med. 1979;25:109-11.

Hohoff A, Joos U, Meyer U, Ehmer U, Stamm T. The spectrum of Apert syndrome: phenotype, particularities in orthodontic treatment, and characteristics of orthognathic surgery. Head Face Med. 2007 Feb 8;3:10.

Anna Verdonck, Julie Bertrand, Carine Carels, Steven Swinnen, Joseph Schoenaers. Orthodontic and orthognathic management of a patient with Apert syndrome: a case report. Journal of Orthodontics Vol. 37 , Iss. 2,2010

Benmiloud, Sarra et al. "Le Syndrome D'apert." The Pan African Medical Journal 14 (2013): 66. PMC. Web. 28 Oct. 2017.

Bhatia, Parul V et al. "Apert's Syndrome: Report of a Rare Case." Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology: JOMFP 17.2 (2013): 294-297. PMC. Web. 28 Oct. 2017.

Kumar GR, Jyothsna M, Ahmed SB, Sree Lakshmi KR. Apert's Syndrome. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014;7:69-72.

Koca, Tuba Tulay. "Apert Syndrome: A Case Report and Review of the Literature." Northern Clinics of Istanbul 3.2 (2016): 135-139. PMC. Web. 28 Oct. 2017.

Source(s) of Funding


No fund has been taken.

Competing Interests


None.

Reviews
0 reviews posted so far

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)