Case Report
 

By Dr. Aswini Misro
Corresponding Author Dr. Aswini Misro
Lumbini Medical College, - Nepal
Submitting Author Dr. Aswini Misro
SURGERY

Laparoscopy, Cholecystectomy, Gallstone, Courvoisier

Misro A. A Mega Gall Bladder Refuting "Courvoisier's Law". WebmedCentral SURGERY 2014;5(6):WMC004653
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2014.004653

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
No
Submitted on: 16 Jun 2014 10:51:36 PM GMT
Published on: 17 Jun 2014 07:28:17 AM GMT

Abstract


Gall Bladder stone is a very common surgical problem. As per Courvoisier’s law the gallstone disease and gallbladder distension do not go hand in hand in lieu of gallstone-induced fibrosis impairing the gall bladder distensability. The present case clearly shows that gallbladder organ distensibility remains unaffected in patients with stone pathology. Although, Courvoisier’s phenomena is observed in some cases, the underlying pathogenic mechanism does not appear to be related to gallstone induced fibrosis.

Introduction


Gall Bladder stone is a very common surgical problem. As per Courvoisier’s law the gallstone disease and gallbladder distension do not go hand in hand in lieu of gallstone-induced fibrosis impairing the gall bladder distensability. The present case clearly shows that gallbladder organ distensibility remains unaffected in patients with stone pathology. Although, Courvoisier’s phenomena is observed in some cases, the underlying pathogenic mechanism does not appear to be related to gallstone induced fibrosis.

Case Report(s)


A 75-year-old female patient presented to surgical outpatient with more than 10 years history of dyspeptic symptoms and right upper quadrant abdominal pain that worsened in the last few months, prior to presentation. There was no past admission for cholecystitis, cholangitis, pancreatitis or obstructive jaundice. Family, past and personal history was not contributory. Abdominal examination was grossly normal except for a palpable gall bladder. All the blood and urine examination including liver function tests and amylase, were within normal reference range. Ultrasound examination of abdomen showed cholelithiasis with normal gallbladder wall thickness and liver echo-texture. There was no abnormality in the biliary tree. In view of symptomatic cholelithiasis, patient was booked for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Intra-operatively, a hugely distended gall bladder extending from the inferior border of the liver till the umbilical port was found (Figure-1). The CBD, liver and rest of the peritoneal cavity were within normal limits.  Despite the intraoperative difficulty to grasp such a huge gall bladder, the operation could be accomplished with standard American four-port technique without any complication. Needle decompression of 294 mill-litre of bile was done at the outset to reduce the size of the gall bladder. During dissection, there was an inadvertent tear in the gall bladder wall resulting in considerable spillage of bile. A suture was placed to secure the leak.

Gross examination of the specimen revealed a gallbladder of dimension 17.5 cm x 3.5 cm (normal gall bladder dimension is 7-10cm) approximately with residual bile amounting to 66mL (normal capacity of a gall bladder is 30-50mL)(Figure 2). Gall bladder wall thickness and interitor mucosal lining were within normal limits. Histo-pathological examination of the gallbladder was unremarkable. Patient's post-operative recovery was uneventful. Patient was further investigated postoperatively by CT scan abdomen and pelvis, MRCP, and upper GI endoscopy, which did not show any obstructive pathology in the biliary tract or pancreas. These tests were not indicated prior to the surgery in lieu of normal preoperative investigations.

Discussion


Enlarged gall bladders are found in conditions like mucocele of the gall Bladder, empyema of gall bladder, malignant obstruction of CBD, and gall bladder carcinoma. Traditionally, the Courvoisier’s law is widely described in relation to palpable gall bladder, which states, "In the presence of a palpable gall bladder, painless jaundice is unlikely to be caused by gallstones". Courvoisier's law1 was named after Ludwig Georg Courvoisier, a surgeon from Basel, Switzerland, who was one of the first surgeons to remove gallstones from the common bile duct. In 1890, Courvoisier published the book Casuistisch-statistische Beiträge zur Pathologie und Chirurgie der Gallenwege, a manual on biliary surgery in which he introduced this medical sign known as Courvoisier's law. The pathogenic mechanism purported behind this observation was that, gallstone disease is a chronic condition that results in a shrunken, fibrotic gall bladder, precluding any organ distension. On the contrary, in malignant obstruction, where the gall bladder pliability is unaffected, huge distension of the organ is a common finding.

Even though the patient is not jaundiced, this case shows the immense distensile capacity of this organ, that is maintained even amidst the so-called ‘chronic gall stone induced fibrosis’ in a patient who has been suffering from this gall stone disease since a decade with several episodes of biliary colic. The observations not only refutes the popular belief correlating gall stone induced fibrosis and non-distensibility of gall bladder, but also points to the possibility of alternate underlying pathogenic mechanisms2 Furthermore, normal gallbladder wall thickness in this case, also shows that gallstone induced fibrosis doesn’t necessarily take place in every case of long standing gall stone disease.

Recent in vitro experiments showed that gallbladder dispensability is similar in stone and non-stone pathologies.3 A study done by Chung et al shows that pliability of the gall bladder was equal in the gall stones, peri-ampullary cancer and in normal subjects.4 In view of the lack of support to the classical explanation, the following alternate explanations are more likely.

1. CBD Stones causes partial and intermittent obstructions (due to “ball-valve” action of stone) leading to less consistent intraductal pressure elevations, and less gallbladder distension. In contrast, malignant diseases cause progressive and total bile duct obstruction leading to more consistent intra-ductal pressure elevation and gall bladder distension.

2. Secondly, the chronicity of obstruction is longer in malignancy as compared to gall stone disease leading to intra-ductal hypertension and gall bladder distension of greater magnitude in the former cases.4

Conclusion


Gall bladder distensibility remains unaffected in patients with gallstone disease. The unlikelihood of CBD stone causing a palpable gallbladder in an obstructive jaundice patient (as described by Courvoisier) is because of intermittent and non-consistent bile duct obstruction rather than gallstone induced fibrosis of the gall bladder.

Legends of the figures


Figure– 1: The intra-operative view of the hugely distended gall bladder.

Figure–2: Post-operative gall bladder specimen containing residual bile following 294 mill-litres of bile aspiration and considerable spillage intra-operatively.

References


1. Courvoisier LJ. Casuistisch-statistische beitrage zur pathologie und chirurgie der gallenweger. Leipzig: Vogel; 1890.
2. Parmar MS (April 2003). "Courvoisier's law". CMAJ 168 (7): 876–7. PMID 12668550. PMC: 151998. http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=12668550.
3. Fitzgerald, J Edward F; White Matthew J, Lobo Dileep N (Apr. 2009). "Courvoisier's gallbladder: law or sign?". World journal of surgery (United States) 33 (4): 886-91. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9908-y. ISSN 0364-2313. PMID 19190960
4. Chung RS. Pathogenesis of the “Courvoisier gallbladder”. Dig Dis Sci 1983;28(1):33-8.

Source(s) of Funding


No

Competing Interests


No

Reviews
1 review posted so far

Courvoisiers Law
Posted by Dr. Veena K Karanth on 15 Jul 2014 03:45:04 AM GMT Reviewed by WMC Editors

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)