Case Report
 

By Dr. Veena Aseeja , Dr. B K Taneja
Corresponding Author Dr. Veena Aseeja
Obs and Gynae MMIMSR Mullana Ambala, - India 160104
Submitting Author Dr. Veena Aseeja
Other Authors Dr. B K Taneja
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MMIMSR, Mullana, MMIMSR, Mullana - India

OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY

Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma, Low Grade stromal sarcoma, Fibroid Uterus

Aseeja V, Taneja BK. Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma-A Case Report and Brief Review. WebmedCentral OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY 2011;2(9):WMC002184
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2011.002184
No
Submitted on: 12 Sep 2011 11:13:38 AM GMT
Published on: 12 Sep 2011 06:04:39 PM GMT

Abstract


Endometrial stromal sarcomas are rare uterine malignancy of mesodermal origin. The diagnosis is usually made post operatively. The usual presentation is abnormal vaginal bleeding, abdominal lump and mild lower abdominal pain. In this case report we present a case of low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma where the preop diagnosis was fibroid uterus with cystic degenerative changes. Total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo oophorectomy was performed. On histopathological examination it turn out a case of low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma.

Introduction


Uterine sarcomas are relatively rare tumours of mesodermal origin. They constitute 2-6% of uterine malignancies. Of these endometrial stromal sarcomas are still rarer tumour. Preoperative diagnosis is usually fibroid uterus.
We report a case of endometrial stromal sarcoma where our preoperative diagnosis was fibroid uterus with cystic degenerative changes.

Case Report(s)


A 45 years old female  P2+0 was admitted to our hospital with complaint of  menorrhagea and mild lower abdominal pain for the last five months. She had periods at interval of twenty five  days and bleeding lasting for ten to twelve days. Flow was excessive with passage of clots. On examination she was severely anaemic. Her hemoglobin was 4.4 gm %. On per abdominal examination there was suprapubic  mass corresponding to eighteen weeks size uterus. On per speculum examination cervix was healthy. On pervaginal examination uterus was uniformly enlarged to eighteen weeks size, soft in consistency and mobile. Bilateral fornices were free. Ultrasound showed an isoechoic and hypoechoic mass measuring 104mm by 90mm in the uterus suggestive of fibroid uterus. Bilateral ovaries were normal. Our clinical diagnosis was fibroid uterus with cystic degenerative changes. Total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed. Prior to surgery she was transfused three units of blood. Intraoperative uterus was enlarged to eighteen weeks size with smooth surface and soft in consistency. Bilateral ovaries were normal. Cut section of the uterus showed a mass 10 x10 cm in size filling the uterine cavity with fluid filled cystic spaces. Histopathological examination of the specimen showed low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Post operative period was uneventful.

Discussion


Uterine Sarcomas are rare tumours of mesodermal origin. They constitute 2 to 6% of uterine malignancies. Of these, Endometrial  stromal sarcomas  are very rare.
They are  divided into three  types depending upon mitotic activity, vascular invasion and observed differences in prognosis.

1 Endometrial stromal nodule,
2 Low grade endometrial sarcoma and
3 high grade or undifferentiated  endometrial stromal sarcoma. (1)

Patients most commonly undergo surgery with presumptive diagnosis of uterine fibroid or pelvic mass. The physician should have suspicion when the histopathological diagnosis of endometrial sampling yields hyperplastic stroma with few glands. (2)
Geeta Puliyath et al reported a case of endometrial stromal sarcoma in 30 yr old female where ultrasound and Doppler findings were suggestive of fibroid uterus. Because of rapid enlargement of fibroid over short period sarcomatous change was suspected. Endometrial aspiration was performed which showed secretary endometrium with neoplastic cells and this changed their decision from myomectomy to hysterectomy. (3)
Hasiakos D et al reported a case of LGSS (Low-Grade Stromal Sarcoma) of endocervix which presented as soft haemorrhagic mass on posterior cervix looking like a degenerated fibroid. (4)
Our patient had short duration of menorrhagea of four months and ultrasound findings suggestive of fibroid with cystic degenerative changes. This shows that high index of suspicion is required to make preoperative diagnosis of endometrial stromal sarcoma particularly in fibroids with any abnormal presentation such as rapid enlargement or abnormal ultrasound findings of heterogeneous mass or fibroid with degenerative changes.
Women with LGESS (Low Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma) are younger than women with other uterine sarcomas, with a median age between 45 and 57 years and, generally do not have the usual risk factors for endometrial cancer. (5)
Surgery is fundamental in LGESS (Low Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma) as in other sarcomas. Treatment generally consists of total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Due to the high recurrence risk even with localized tumors, many clinicians advocate use of adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and/or hormone therapy to suppress tumor growth.
The surgical stage is most significant prognostic regarding recurrence and survival in LGESS (Low Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma). They tend to grow slowly and commonly recur many years after initial diagnosis. (6)
Postoperative pelvic radiotherapy reduces local recurrence but has not been consistently shown to prolong the survival.

Conclusion


Endometrial stromal sarcomas are very rare tumors of mesodermal origin presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding, mostly in perimenopausal women. The usual pre operative diagnosis is fibroid and the diagnosis is made after histopathological examination. High index of suspicion of sarcoma in uterine tumors with the features not typical of fibroid can make the preoperative diagnosis of uterine sarcomas and hence better management. Our patient also had uterine tumor with not typical features of fibroid where we thought it to be fibroid with cystic degenerative changes and it came out low grade endometrial sarcoma.

References


1. Berek JS(ed). Novaks Gynaecology 14th edn. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2006 :1382-84.
2. Mert G, Aydin C, Cenk MG, Ali B, Seyran Y. A Case of Malignant Low Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma and Review of the Literature: J Turkish german gynecol assoc.2004; 5(1):73-75.
3. Puliyath G, Nair RV, Singh S .Endometrial stromal sarcoma, A case report: Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology.2010; 31(1):21-23.
4. Hasiakos D, Papkonstantinou K, Kondi-Paphiti A, Fotiou S. Low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma of the endocervix. Report of a case and review of literature: Eur J gynaecol Oncol.2007; 28(6):483-6.
5. Ganjoei TA, Behtash N, Shariat M, Mosavi A.Low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma of uterine corpus, a clinicopathological and survey study in 14 cases. World J Surg Oncl 2006; 4:50.
6. Mukhopadhyay P, Sharma P.P, Muraleedharan P.D, Sarkar S: A case of endometrial stromal sarcoma: The journal of obstetrics and gynecology of India. 2008;58(1):73-74.

Source(s) of Funding


Nil

Competing Interests


None

Disclaimer


This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

Reviews
3 reviews posted so far

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)