Original Articles
 

By Dr. Shivalingappa B Javali
Corresponding Author Dr. Shivalingappa B Javali
Department of Biostatistics, SDM College of Dental Sciences, - India 580009
Submitting Author Dr. Shivalingappa B Javali
BIOSTATISTICS

Structural Equation Model, Medical and Oral Health Care, Sick Person

Javali SB. A Structural Equation Model of the Determinants of Health Care in the Surveyed Households in Rural of Dharwad District, Karnataka State, India. WebmedCentral BIOSTATISTICS 2011;2(3):WMC001698
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2011.001698
No
Submitted on: 07 Mar 2011 07:29:23 AM GMT
Published on: 07 Mar 2011 06:20:42 PM GMT

Abstract


Purpose: To examine the causal relationships among factors determining how much care people are willing to purchase.
Method: A systematic random sample of 1408 persons interviewed from 320 households,in which 418 persons were reported with health problems.Out of this 235 persons were reported with medical health problems and 218 persons were reported with oral health problems during reference period of study.The data on different factors were collected through direct personal interview method. The causal relationships were established by structural equation modeling (SEM) method using SPSS and AMOS statistical software.
Results: The SEM fitted to the medical and oral health care data adequately.The results indicated that, the age of sick person, duration of illness episode (in days) and the total number of visits made to source of health care during the reference period had significant effect on medical health care expenditure (p
Conclusions: The duration of illness episode (in days) and the total number of visits made to source of health care during the reference period are the main contributors to both medical and oral health care expenditure in surveyed households in rural of Dharwad district, Karnataka State, India. It is proposed that to increase in the demand for health care, efforts should be made to reduce the duration of illness, the distance traveled by the sick person or patient and also the number of visits to health care providers. It may lead to improved health status at lower expenditure.


Introduction


Medical and oral health care are fundamentally different from the usual commodities like, food clothes, or any other commodity, which purchased by an individual. In the consumption of medical and oral health cares are, for rationally to hold, the consumer must be ill and most individuals would prefer no to be. This simple fact has significant consequences for the economic analysis of health care. A large number of marketable commodities affect on health; are only consumed on the presumption that it has investment benefits in good health status.
Health care is critical investment for personality development in present society. National Health (Public) policy for health has been based on implicit assumptions of health care as a basic right to which people should not be denied access on grounds of inability to pay or other socio-economic and others reasons. However, the resources provided by the government to achieve better health status through the provision of high priority of primary health care services for the vast majority of the population have been insufficient. The continued trend of increases in the cost of health care as well as growth of population that all persons of the society deserve adequate health care have spurred economists and other social scientists to study the health care including oral health care sector of the economy extensively. This study looks for to recognize which factors are influencing in determining how much care people are willing to procure. Few studies are found in literature relating to study the determinants of health care sources utilization (Abu-Zeid and Dann, 1985; Basu, 1983; Ellis et al., 1994; Marin et al., 1983; Sack, 1980; Sodani, 1999). Thus, the regression analysis is a popular methodology for determining the influences of factors on health care in many sciences including medical and oral health sciences. The strength of regression analysis is the ability to capture direct effects or multiple relationships simultaneously, while providing a simple and fast estimation results. Some times the indirectly factors play a significant role on health care. Hence, the regression analysis is not an appropriate method to determine the indirect effects of factors. Hence, in this article used the applications of Path Analysis or Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). SEM as a statistical technique has increased in popularity since it was first conceived by Wright (1918; 1934); a biometrician who developed the path analysis method to analyze genetic theory in biology. SEM enjoyed a renaissance in the early 1970s, particularly in sociology and econometrics (Goldberger and Duncan, 1973) and later spread to other disciplines, such as psychology, political science, and education (Werts & Linn, 1970). It was believed that the growth and popularity of SEM was attributed to a large part to the advancement of software development that have made SEM readily accessible to substantive researchers who have found this method to be well-suited to addressing a variety of research questions (MacCallum& Austin, 2000). Some examples of such software include LISREL (LInear Structural RELations), EQS, AMOS (Analysis of Moment Structures) and MPlus. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to use SEM to develop a model that offers a potential explanation for direct and indirect relationships of factors on health care expenditure separately for medical and oral health care expenditure.

Methods


Subjects
The study was conducted to determine the factors influential in determining the demand for medical and oral health care in the surveyed households in rural of Dharwad district, Karnataka State, India. The Dharwad district is situated in northern part of Karnataka state, India. It included four taluka places according 2001 population census namely Dharwad, Navalgund, Kundgol and Kalghatgi. Then listed number of villages in each taluka place and selected 16 villages randomly (4 villages from each taluka place). Later, systematic random samples of 80 households were selected in each taluka place (20 from each village). Totally, 1408 rural persons interviewed from 320 households, in which 418 persons were reported with health problems. Out of this, 235 persons were reported medical health problems and 218 persons were reported oral health problems during reference period of study. Further the data on different factors were collected through personal interview method. The interview was conducted with head of the household or knowledgeable person in the family, who could be able to respond. The study is based on lay reporting of the illness and not on a clinical examination.
Demand for Health Care
The demand for health care (medical and oral health care separately) depends on the existence and perception of physiological needs of the individual along with willingness to meet the felt needs and ability to secure health care6. In demand for health care, the physiological need is measured by the age of the sick person (in years) (X1). The perception need is measured by one variable i.e. duration of illness episode (in days) (X2). The willingness to meet felt need by securing health care is reflected by five variables relating to no of visits, distance of care from the residence, education of sick person, family size and family monthly income. Education is measured by one variable i.e. education of the sick person (X5). A visit made to source of care is measured by total number of visits made to source of health care during the reference period (X3). Proximity of health care services is measured by distance of care from the residence of the household (in km) (X4). Family size is measured through the total number of living persons in the household (X6). Finally, ability to secure health care is represented by one economic variable measured through only household’s monthly income (X7).
Total expenditure on health care (medical health cares expenditure (Y1), oral health cares expenditure (Y2)) influenced by explanatory variables and expenditure includes expenditure incurred during the reference period only, on all components of direct expenditure i.e. Doctors fees, Medicines, Test charges, Hospital fees and indirect expenditure i.e. Transportation on accompanying persons etc.
Selection of variables
Taking into consideration the data available for the analysis, the expenditure on medical (Y1) and oral health care (Y2) is taken as two different response variables and seven factors were taken as explanatory variables. Among 7 explanatory variables, four variables have been chosen as intermediate variables (direct effective) namely age of the sick person (X1), the duration of illness episode (in days) (X2), the total number of visits made to source of health care during the reference period (X3) and the distance of care from the residence of the household (in km) (X4). The three variables were taken as a indirect effective variables of health care i.e. the education of the sick person (X5), the total number of living persons in the household (X6) and the household monthly income (X7). The numerical data were obtained for all these variables with sufficient care and response rate have been observed more than 97% in all households, it leads to quality of analysis.
Statistical analysis
The correlation matrix was generated using Pearson’s ‘r’ to determine the relationships between and among explanatory variables with medical health care expenditure and oral health care expenditure. The presence of explanatory variables with very strong relationships with response variable prevents an SEM solution. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows Version16.0 (SPSS; Chicago, IL, USA) (2007). Further analysis on SEM was performed using Analysis of Moment Structure Version 5.1 (AMOS: ADC, Chicago, IL, USA) (2003). The main focus was on testing hypotheses about relationships among the variables in the structural model. The criteria for assessing the structural model are the same as the measurement model using standardized regression estimates (B). Evaluation of structural model involves use of fit indices (Bentler and Chou, 1987; Steiger, 1990; Hu LTand Bentler, 1999). The chi-square statistic provides a test of the null hypothesis, ensuring that the theoretical model fits the data. If p-values are more than 0.05 indicate a good fit. A root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) value close to 0.06, and adjusted goodness-of-fit index (AGFI) and comparative fit index (CFI) values close to 0.9 indicate acceptable fit of the model. The AMOS also allows the use of modification indices to improve the model fit by drawing a correlation function between the identified variables (Byrne, 2001; WL Cheah et al., 2010). All the hypothesized paths in the conceptual model (Figure 1 and Figure 2) were tested and included in the structural model.


Results


The relationships between explanatory variables and predictor variable i.e. medical health care expenditure are shown in Table 1. It clears that, the age of sick person, the duration of illness, the number of care visits, the distance of care from the residence, education of sick person and household’s monthly income were significantly and positively correlated with medical health care expenditure (p
Correspondingly, the correlations between explanatory variables and oral health care expenditure are shown in Table 2. It clears that, the age of sick person, duration of illness, number of care visits, education of sick person and family monthly income were significantly and positively correlated with oral health care expenditure (p
The structural model
A.Medical Health care expenditure
Similarly, a path diagram of the structural model of factors that influence medical health care expenditure is shown (Figure 1). All paths that were significant or not significant are shown in the diagram. The RMSEA was 0.049, AGFI 0.76, and CFI 0.88, all of which indicated an acceptable fit. The chi-square value for the structural model was 13.1401, p=0.1564, with degrees of freedom of 9 (p>0.05). Therefore, the SEM model of factors that influence medical health care expenditure was significant. This model was better fit to medical health care expenditure.
The direct effect of age of the sick person (in years) duration of illness episode (in days) and total number of visits made to source of health care during the reference period on medical health care expenditure was found to statistically significant. It means that, the impact or influence of these variables on medical health care expenditure of sick person is statistically significant (p
B.oral Health care expenditure
A path diagram of the structural model of factors that influence oral health care expenditure is shown (Figure 2). All paths that were significant or not significant are shown in the diagram. The RMSEA was 0.056, AGFI 0.78, and CFI 0.824, all of which indicated an acceptable fit. The chi-square value for the structural model was 16.5494, p=0.0562, with degrees of freedom of 9 (p>0.05). Therefore, the SEM model of factors that influence oral health care expenditure was significant. This model was not better fit as compared to SEM model of medical health care expenditure.
The direct effect of duration of illness episode (in days), total number of visits made to source of health care during the reference period and distance of care from the residence of the household (in km) on oral health care expenditure was found to statistically significant. It means that, the impact or influence of these variables on oral health care expenditure of sick person is statistically significant (p

Discussion


Over a period of time, some factors contributing to health care among different populations are well established. An understanding of these factors is essential for planners and policy-makers when designing and implementing intervention and preventive programs. Structural equation modeling was chosen; because of it identifies causal or underlying relationships among hypothesized constructs, rather than simple associations among explanatory variables with response variable. It is a painstaking approach to determining the systematic and statistical significance of the covariance between each construct and outcome in a path diagram (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The path diagram also shows the sequence of constructs and distinguishes collinearlity between the predictors, supporting the causal confirmation. The variables such as age of sick person, duration of illness, number of care visits, education of sick person and family monthly income have significant and positive relationship with oral health care expenditure. Also the age of sick person, duration of illness, number of care visits, distance of care from the residence, education of sick person and family monthly income have significant and positive relationship with medical health care expenditure.
This study has recognized three determinants as the predictors of medical health care expenditure of sick persons are: age of the sick person, the duration of illness episode (in days) and the total number of visits made to source of health care during the reference period. Similarly, the three determinants as the predictors of oral health care expenditure of sick persons observed are: the duration of illness episode (in days), the total number of visits made to source of health care during the reference period and the distance of care from the residence of the household (in km). This indicates, the duration of illness episode (in days) and the total number of visits made to source of health care during the reference period are the main contributors to both Medical and oral health care expenditure in surveyed households in rural of Dharwad district, Karnataka State, India.

Conclusion(s)


It concluded from this study is that the available health care facilities are not able to meet the expectations of the people; hence people have to travel long distances to get the desired health care in the region.  It is also evident from the study that the duration of illness is important enough in explaining expenditure on health care and due to this more number of visits are required.  Therefore, it is proposed that to increase in the demand for health care, efforts should be made to reduce the duration of illness, the distance traveled by the sick person or patient and also the number of visits to health care providers.  All these efforts may be possible through delivery of better quality services, increased out-rich of services and effective oral health education. It may lead to improved health status including both Medical and oral health at lower expenditure.

References


1. Abu-Zeid HA, Dann WM. Health services utilization and cost in Ismailia,. Egypt. Social Science and Medicine 1985; 21:451-61.
2. Basu A.: Socio-Demographic Determinants of Health Implications for health care policy in America. Population Review 1983; 27:1-2.
3. Ellis, RP, McInnes, DK, Stephenson, EH. Inpatient and out-patient health care demand in Cairo, Egypt, Health Economics 1994; 3:183-200.
4. Marin BV, Marin G, Padilla AM, De La Rocha C, Fay J. Health care utilization by low income clients of a community clinic.  An Archival Study, Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 1983; 5(1): 65-80.
5. Sack RA. The effects of utilization of health care costs.  American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1980; 137(2):270-275.
6. Sodani PR. Determinants of Demand for health care in the surveyed tribal households of selected three districts of Rajasthan. Demography India, 1999; 28 (2):257-271.
7. Wright S. On the nature of size factors. Genetics, 1918; 3: 367-374.
8. Wright S. The method of path coefficients.  Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1934; 5: 161-215.  
9. Goldberger and Duncan OD. Structural equation models in the social sciences, Seminar Press, New York, 1973.
10. Werts, CE, & Linn, RL. A general linear model for studying growth. Psychological Bulletin 1970; 73:17-22.
11. MacCallum, RC, & Austin, JT. Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology 2000; 51: 201-226.
12. Statistical Package for the social sciences, SPSS users guide, Chicago: SPSS Inc, 2007.
13. Analysis of Moment Structure Version 5.0.1, AMOS: ADC, Spring house, PA, USA, 2003.
14. Bentler PM, Chou CP. Practical issues in structuring modelling. In: JS Long (ed.). Common problems in quantitative social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage 1987; 161-192.
15. Steiger JH. Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1990; 25: 173-180.
16. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 1999; 6: 1-55.
17. WL Cheah, WAM Wan Muda, Z-H Zamh. A structural equation model of the determinants of malnutrition among children in rural Kelantan, Malaysia, Rural and Remote Health 10: 1248. (Online), 2010
18. Byrne BM. Structural equation modelling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications and programming. New Jersey, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate; 2001.

Source(s) of Funding


none

Competing Interests


Not assisted by any financial support. 

Disclaimer


This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)