Submited on: 02 Sep 2011 12:13:47 AM GMT
Published on: 02 Sep 2011 04:41:44 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Partly
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    It may be difficult to diagnose Necrotizing enterocolites based only on Plain X-ray's.

  • Competing interests:
    Nil
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    have experience with Dengue Heemorhagic fever as I workas an Internist/neurologist in a large tertiary level center

  • How to cite:  Prasad A .Necrotizing Enterocolitis with Circulatory Failure in an Adolescent with Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever: A Case Report [Review of the article 'Necrotizing Enterocolitis with Circulatory Failure in an Adolescent with Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever: A Case Report ' by Salleh H].WebmedCentral 2011;2(9):WMCRW00948
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse