Submited on: 08 Jul 2011 04:53:40 AM GMT
Published on: 08 Jul 2011 05:37:52 PM GMT
Lesions on dorsum of hand
Posted by Dr. Harish Kumar on 12 Aug 2011 02:10:40 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Relatively rare location of lesion. Nicely written manuscript. Good quality image.

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Done graduation

  • How to cite:  Kumar H .Lesions on dorsum of hand[Review of the article 'Lesions on Dorsum of Hand ' by Kesar V].WebmedCentral 2011;2(8):WMCRW00890
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse