WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Posted by Mr. Brian Thompson on 09 Jul 2011 01:30:23 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
An independant review with research - worth reading.
Competing interests:
none
Invited by the author to review this article? :
Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

Assisting in rehabilation
How to cite: Thompson B .How Danderous is ...............................................................................[Review of the article 'How Danderous is Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)? ' by Thompson S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(7):WMCRW00849

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse

MEK as an occupational hazard

Posted by Ms. Holly Chinnery on 05 Jul 2011 09:40:09 AM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
An interesting look at the occupiational hazards and the related possible long term effects on the workers exposed.
Invited by the author to review this article? :
Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

Research assistant
How to cite: Chinnery H .MEK as an occupational hazard[Review of the article 'How Danderous is Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)? ' by Thompson S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(7):WMCRW00840

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse