Submited on: 15 Mar 2011 03:43:18 PM GMT
Published on: 16 Mar 2011 10:20:59 PM GMT
 
Recovery After Hysterectomy: A Year-Long Look
Posted by Mr. Govind N Purohit on 21 Mar 2011 04:39:35 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Partly
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The abstract does not cover the results

    The Backgroubd is too lengthy and should be reduced to one paragraph only 

    The Discussion is missing

    The references are too many

    The references cited in the text must be changed to et al when there are more than two scientists

    If References are numbered in the bibliograpgy they must be cited by nymbers in the text also otherwise the numbers should be removed and references mentioned alphabetically.

    Tables are mentioned in the text but missing with the MS.

    Results not presented as mentioned in the experimental design.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    no experience on hysterectomies in human females

  • How to cite:  Purohit G N.Recovery After Hysterectomy: A Year-Long Look[Review of the article 'Recovery After Hysterectomy: A Year-Long Look ' by Welz H].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00608
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse