Submited on: 17 Mar 2011 10:15:58 AM GMT
Published on: 17 Mar 2011 04:07:24 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Partly
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The Abstract does not fully cover the results

    Numerical figures after a full stop should be mentioned in words

    The Results presented are too lengthy. It would have been better if the results had ben summarized in the form of a table mentioning the various percentages

  • Competing interests:
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    termination of pregnancy in farm animals is entirely different from what it is in human females

  • How to cite:  Purohit G N.Termination of Pregnancy for Mild Foetal Abnormalities: Opinions of Physicians[Review of the article 'Termination of Pregnancy for Mild Foetal Abnormalities: Opinions of Physicians ' by Herve C].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00607
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse