WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Submited on: 07 Mar 2011 08:19:24 AM GMT

Published on: 07 Mar 2011 06:18:59 PM GMT

Very meshy writup

Posted by Prof. Prasunpriya Nayak on 12 Mar 2011 11:06:06 AM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	No
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	No
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	No
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	No
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	Yes
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	Yes
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	No
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	No
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	No
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	No

Other Comments:
The article is without any objective. The sturcture of the article is far from satisfactory. There is plenty of spelling and gammatical mistakes. The abstract is absent. Results are missing. Figure(s) is(are) missing. The INTRODUCTION is too long. No need of those comments.
Competing interests:
NO
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

For last 20 years I am working in the field of neurotoxicology
How to cite: Nayak P .Very meshy writup[Review of the article 'Toxicity of Lps and Opa Exposure on Blood with Different Methods ' by Vyas S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00577

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse