Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Partly
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
No
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
No
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
Yes
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
No
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
Yes
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
Yes
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
Yes
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
Yes
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
No
Other Comments:
An interesting subject rather over-complicated in style. However, I can appreciate the work that has gone into prodcuing the paper.
Competing interests: None
Invited by the author to review this article? : No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
Rehabilitation and multi-disciplinary collaboration in clinical and research settings.
How to cite: Thompson S B.Immuno-prophylaxis...[Review of the article 'Immuno-prophylaxis against development of cardiac valvular complications in patients with rheumatic fever: A proposed method ' by Tonpay P].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00575
An interesting subject rather over-complicated in style. However, I can appreciate the work that has gone into prodcuing the paper.
None
No
No
None
Rehabilitation and multi-disciplinary collaboration in clinical and research settings.