Submited on: 09 Mar 2011 01:54:50 PM GMT
Published on: 10 Mar 2011 09:55:13 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    1. A photo of the abdominal cavity showing the relation of the leiomyoma to the uterus would have been helpful to the reader.

    2. Instead of "term", it would be nice to know how many weeks of pregnancy were completed.

    3. How was the decision to deliver made? It is unclear whether she experienced early labor or labor.

     

  • Competing interests:
    none
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    30 years gyn private practice

  • How to cite:  Cohain J S.Great article that could be improved with more photographs[Review of the article 'A Large Leiomyoma Causes Concern During Pregnancy And Parturition ' by Mahendru R].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00573
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse