Submited on: 08 Jan 2011 10:46:26 AM GMT
Published on: 10 Jan 2011 01:16:27 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? No
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? No
  • Other Comments:

    Dear author,

    It is a good work for thinking of writing to the journal but at the sametime you should follow the protocols of writing a case report with discussion,conclusion and reference kindly include them in your case report and please resubmit

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    more than 7years

  • How to cite:  Pandurengan K .incisional hernia-subcostal incision-a case report[Review of the article 'Case Report On Giant Incisional Hernia In Subcostal Incision ' by Agarwal P].WebmedCentral 2011;2(11):WMCRW001141
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Partly
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Partly
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    not avery rare type of hernia

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    3yrs residency

  • How to cite:  kumar n .Case Report On Giant Incisional Hernia In Subcostal Incision[Review of the article 'Case Report On Giant Incisional Hernia In Subcostal Incision ' by Agarwal P].WebmedCentral 2011;2(2):WMCRW00508
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    not very rare type of incisional hernia though not seen very frequently but good work......

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    3yrs residency gen surgery

  • How to cite:  nath d .Case Report On Giant Incisional Hernia In Subcostal Incision[Review of the article 'Case Report On Giant Incisional Hernia In Subcostal Incision ' by Agarwal P].WebmedCentral 2011;2(2):WMCRW00507
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    are there co-factors (diabetes, smoking abits, empoyment, etc.) which could explain this incisional hernia?

  • Competing interests:
    none
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    good

  • How to cite:  Mearini L .Case Report On Giant Incisional Hernia In Subcostal Incision [Review of the article 'Case Report On Giant Incisional Hernia In Subcostal Incision ' by Agarwal P].WebmedCentral 2011;2(1):WMCRW00374
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? No
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    First the incisional hernia through non-vertical incisions are not rare. They are known to occur following renal (lumber) incision, as well as Kocher's incision. The incidence has decreased only due to more laparoscopic surgeries.

    Case report section needs corrections regarding grammer & language mistakes. There are lot.

    Discussion & references are totally missing.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    14 years.

  • How to cite:  Shamim M .Case Report On Giant Incisional Hernia In Subcostal Incision[Review of the article 'Case Report On Giant Incisional Hernia In Subcostal Incision ' by Agarwal P].WebmedCentral 2011;2(1):WMCRW00354
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse