Submited on: 04 Oct 2010 11:09:26 AM GMT
Published on: 05 Oct 2010 08:11:16 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The paper reports important information about the strongyle infection in north east India. 

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    25 years

  • How to cite:  Pattanayak A .Incidence of Strongyle infection in cattle and pig with relevance to rainfall in Meghalaya [Review of the article 'Incidence of Strongyle infection in cattle and pig with relevance to rainfall in Meghalaya ' by Bhattacharya D].WebmedCentral 2011;2(1):WMCRW00341
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Untitled
Posted by Dr. Chandan Rajkhowa on 20 Nov 2010 12:38:30 PM GMT

  • Other Comments:

    I have gone through the article and observed the following points.

    1. The materials and methods need elaboration as because there is no indication for the methods adopted .

    2. The author should specifically mentioned the taxonomic laboratory from where the identification was done

    3.Author should narrate the discussion supported by relevant references for the new predilection site.

    The paper should be revised with the relevant points given and can be accepted as short communication.

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
    None
  • How to cite:  Rajkhowa C .Untitled[Review of the article 'Incidence of Strongyle infection in cattle and pig with relevance to rainfall in Meghalaya ' by Bhattacharya D].WebmedCentral 2011;1(11):WMCRW00156
Report abuse