Submited on: 16 Jul 2016 11:08:45 AM GMT
Published on: 18 Jul 2016 01:39:57 PM GMT
 
Please see in other comment section.
Posted by Dr. Mohammad K Alam on 17 Aug 2016 02:48:17 AM GMT Reviewed by WMC Editors

  • What are the main claims of the paper and how important are they?

    Please see in other comment section.


  • Are these claims novel? If not, please specify papers that weaken the claims to the originality of this one.

    Please see in other comment section.


  • Are the claims properly placed in the context of the previous literature?

    Please see in other comment section.


  • Do the results support the claims? If not, what other evidence is required?

    Please see in other comment section.


  • If a protocol is provided, for example for a randomized controlled trial, are there any important deviations from it? If so, have the authors explained adequately why the deviations occurred?

    Please see in other comment section.


  • Is the methodology valid? Does the paper offer enough details of its methodology that its experiments or its analyses could be reproduced?

    Please see in other comment section.


  • Would any other experiments or additional information improve the paper? How much better would the paper be if this extra work was done, and how difficult would such work be to do, or to provide?

    Please see in other comment section.


  • Is this paper outstanding in its discipline? (For example, would you like to see this work presented in a seminar at your hospital or university? Do you feel these results need to be incorporated in your next general lecture on the subject?) If yes, what makes it outstanding? If not, why not?

    Please see in other comment section.


  • Other Comments:

    1. Etiology should be explained in detail. If  possible include some diagrams
    2. Material and methods, and results of the studies are not mentioned.
    3. Describe in detail the criteria used for inclusion and exclusion the articles searched in databases.
    4. I suggest making a new table 1, schematically in detail explaining in detail all the process of literature review.
    5. Include a paragraph of result, describing the selected final articles.
    6. Revise the references and the text citations according to the journal's style.
    7. Plagiarism to be reduced
    8. Please see the recently published article.
    http://www.sciencedomain.org/issue/1940

  • Competing interests:

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:

    Please see in other comment section.

  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I have published paper on it.

  • How to cite:  Alam M K.Please see in other comment section.[Review of the article 'White spot lesions and its management An overview ' by Chinde V].WebmedCentral 2016;7(8):WMCRW003296
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse