Posted by Dr. Mohammad Othman on 26 Sep 2015 02:17:06 PM GMTReviewed by
WMC Editors
What are the main claims of the paper and how important are they?
This is a case report and not a study, so, no claims. But there is no literature review any where which may make it wrong claim.
Are these claims novel? If not, please specify papers that weaken the claims to the originality of this one.
Yes , claim of a literature review and it is not there.
Are the claims properly placed in the context of the previous literature?
No, there is no place for this claim since,it is not done.
Do the results support the claims? If not, what other evidence is required?
No, to be true it needs to be done.
If a protocol is provided, for example for a randomized controlled trial, are there any important deviations from it? If so, have the authors explained adequately why the deviations occurred?
None
Is the methodology valid? Does the paper offer enough details of its methodology that its experiments or its analyses could be reproduced?
None
Would any other experiments or additional information improve the paper? How much better would the paper be if this extra work was done, and how difficult would such work be to do, or to provide?
Review of treatment methods which was attembted but failed badly and resulted in normal discussion
Is this paper outstanding in its discipline? (For example, would you like to see this work presented in a seminar at your hospital or university? Do you feel these results need to be incorporated in your next general lecture on the subject?) If yes, what makes it outstanding? If not, why not?
No
Other Comments:
Please when you call something review try to go up to the expectation
Invited by the author to review this article? : Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: Yes
References:
2 case reports one with review
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
Consultant, author and reviewer
How to cite: Othman M .Uterine fibroids: Repeat myomectomy converted to supracervical hysterectomy. A case report and literature review.[Review of the article 'Uterine fibroids: Repeat myomectomy converted to supracervical hysterectomy. A case report and literature review. ' by Uzoma O].WebmedCentral 2015;6(9):WMCRW003247
This is a case report and not a study, so, no claims. But there is no literature review any where which may make it wrong claim.
Yes , claim of a literature review and it is not there.
No, there is no place for this claim since,it is not done.
No, to be true it needs to be done.
None
None
Review of treatment methods which was attembted but failed badly and resulted in normal discussion
No
Please when you call something review try to go up to the expectation
Yes
Yes
2 case reports one with review
Consultant, author and reviewer