What are the main claims of the paper and how important are they?
New population genetics study with a strong antropology meaning. useful and interesting, it adds something resumtpive to the literature data
Are these claims novel? If not, please specify papers that weaken the claims to the originality of this one.
Yes, the claims are novel
Are the claims properly placed in the context of the previous literature?
Yes, the claims are properly discussed and placed in the literature articles
Do the results support the claims? If not, what other evidence is required?
Yes, the results completely satisfy the title
If a protocol is provided, for example for a randomized controlled trial, are there any important deviations from it? If so, have the authors explained adequately why the deviations occurred?
Yes, the methodology is properly and expertly described
Is the methodology valid? Does the paper offer enough details of its methodology that its experiments or its analyses could be reproduced?
Yes, valid although not innovative
Would any other experiments or additional information improve the paper? How much better would the paper be if this extra work was done, and how difficult would such work be to do, or to provide?
No, the astudy is complete with reagard to the aim
Is this paper outstanding in its discipline? (For example, would you like to see this work presented in a seminar at your hospital or university? Do you feel these results need to be incorporated in your next general lecture on the subject?) If yes, what makes it outstanding? If not, why not?
Yes, the paper adds something to the published literature
Other Comments:
The article is interesting and useful
Competing interests: Nil
Invited by the author to review this article? : No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
Genetics
How to cite: Lo Vasco V .The Evolution Of Alu Mutations In The Human Genome[Review of the article 'The Evolution Of Alu Mutations In The Human Genome ' by Albrecht-Buehler G].WebmedCentral 2012;3(11):WMCRW002342
New population genetics study with a strong antropology meaning. useful and interesting, it adds something resumtpive to the literature data
Yes, the claims are novel
Yes, the claims are properly discussed and placed in the literature articles
Yes, the results completely satisfy the title
Yes, the methodology is properly and expertly described
Yes, valid although not innovative
No, the astudy is complete with reagard to the aim
Yes, the paper adds something to the published literature
The article is interesting and useful
Nil
No
No
None
Genetics