Home » Reviews
Detection of a Point Mutation at Codon 12 of the Kirsten-Ras (K-ras) Oncogen in Myelodysplastic Syndrome
By Dr. Howida M Sharaf , Dr. Nihal S El- Kinawy , Dr. Ayman O Mahmoud , Dr. Manal A Ali
Submited on: 11 May 2012 03:41:45 PM GMT
Published on: 12 May 2012 01:09:21 PM GMT
 
Detection of a point mutation at codon 12 of the Kirsten-Ras (K-ras) oncogen in myelodysplastic syndrome
Posted by Dr. Sahar S Zalam on 14 May 2012 09:16:35 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

     I think from my point of view , this is a very good work starting from the idea, the work, statistics , illustration and table, the discussion and the conclusion

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am assistant professor of hematology and clinical pathology

  • How to cite:  Zalam S S.Detection of a point mutation at codon 12 of the Kirsten-Ras (K-ras) oncogen in myelodysplastic syndrome[Review of the article ' Detection of a Point Mutation at Codon 12 of the Kirsten-Ras (K-ras) Oncogen in Myelodysplastic Syndrome ' by Ali M].WebmedCentral 2012;3(5):WMCRW001805
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Detection of a point Mutation at Codon 12 of the Kirsten-Ras (K-ras) Oncogen in Myelodysplastic Syndrome.
Posted by Dr. Somya H Soloma on 14 May 2012 11:37:01 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    From my point of view, I found that this study is a very good one in this point and it covered all points in a good way from the beginning to the end of the study.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Yes I have long time experience in this area.

  • How to cite:  Soloma S H.Detection of a point Mutation at Codon 12 of the Kirsten-Ras (K-ras) Oncogen in Myelodysplastic Syndrome.[Review of the article ' Detection of a Point Mutation at Codon 12 of the Kirsten-Ras (K-ras) Oncogen in Myelodysplastic Syndrome ' by Ali M].WebmedCentral 2012;3(5):WMCRW001802
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Review of Detection of a Point Mutation at Codon 12 of the Kirsten-Ras (K-ras) Oncogen in Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Posted by Dr. Neriyana S Satish on 14 May 2012 03:42:18 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    good article

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Nil

  • How to cite:  Satish N S.Review of Detection of a Point Mutation at Codon 12 of the Kirsten-Ras (K-ras) Oncogen in Myelodysplastic Syndrome[Review of the article ' Detection of a Point Mutation at Codon 12 of the Kirsten-Ras (K-ras) Oncogen in Myelodysplastic Syndrome ' by Ali M].WebmedCentral 2012;3(5):WMCRW001801
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
 
 
We use cookies on this website to measure and improve performance. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.