Submited on: 16 Feb 2012 10:08:44 AM GMT
Published on: 16 Feb 2012 01:03:02 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Well designed, acceptable diction.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Attended to some patients with this condition

  • How to cite:  Wangwe G .Abdominal tuberculosis mimicking annular pancreas in an adult[Review of the article 'Abdominal Tuberculosis Mimicking Annular Pancreas in an Adult ' by Ongeti K].WebmedCentral 2012;3(2):WMCRW001499
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Endoscopic ultrasound maybe helpful
Posted by Mr. Feng Yih Chai on 16 Feb 2012 03:29:14 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Partly
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Ongeti et al presented an interesting case of intestinal obstruction due to periduodenal TB lymphadenopthy that mimics annular pancreas. In gastrointestinal TB, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and Mantoux test may help in its diagnosis. Furthermore, if resources are available, endoscopic ultrasound assessment and fine needle aspiration of the periduodenal mass or suspicious annular pancreas may be helpful.

  • Competing interests:
    nil
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Managed similiar patients with gastrointestinal TB

  • How to cite:  Chai F .Endoscopic ultrasound maybe helpful[Review of the article 'Abdominal Tuberculosis Mimicking Annular Pancreas in an Adult ' by Ongeti K].WebmedCentral 2012;3(2):WMCRW001498
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse