Submited on: 11 Feb 2012 07:32:42 PM GMT
Published on: 14 Feb 2012 10:31:28 AM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Partly
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Could you please do MDM2 mutation to rule our the possibility of well differentiated liposarcoma?

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Pathologsit loves Head and Neck pathology

  • How to cite:  Li J .A Recurent Subcutaneous Lipoma of the Para-Parotid Area [Review of the article 'A Recurent Subcutaneous Lipoma of the Para-Parotid Area ' by Sierra-rosas H].WebmedCentral 2012;3(2):WMCRW001497
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse