Submited on: 23 Dec 2011 07:52:57 AM GMT
Published on: 23 Dec 2011 06:18:09 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The quality of gross pisture is not good enough. Can author replace it by a new picture, or delete it and replaceit by CT and MEI pictrue.

     

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    --

  • How to cite:  Li J .Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma of Parotid - A Rare Case Report [Review of the article 'Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma of Parotid - A Rare Case Report ' by Mahapatra S].WebmedCentral 2012;3(2):WMCRW001494
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse