Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Yes
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
Yes
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
No
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
Yes
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
Yes
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
No
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
Yes
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
Yes
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
Yes
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
Yes
Other Comments:
The quality of gross pisture is not good enough. Can author replace it by a new picture, or delete it and replaceit by CT and MEI pictrue.
Competing interests: No
Invited by the author to review this article? : No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
--
How to cite: Li J .Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma of Parotid - A Rare Case Report [Review of the article 'Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma of Parotid - A Rare Case Report ' by Mahapatra S].WebmedCentral 2012;3(2):WMCRW001494
The quality of gross pisture is not good enough. Can author replace it by a new picture, or delete it and replaceit by CT and MEI pictrue.
No
No
No
None
--