Submited on: 28 Jan 2012 08:06:21 AM GMT
Published on: 28 Jan 2012 10:25:27 AM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    1. Material nad methods requires more elaborate mention of randamization/ blinding and statistical tools used.

    2. The discussion should be more explanatory, comparing and discussing a few more relevant studies.

  • Competing interests:
    None
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Quite many years.

  • How to cite:  Mishra L D.Lumbar Facet Joint Infiltration in Post Laminectomy Pain[Review of the article 'Lumbar Facet Joint Infiltration in Post Laminectomy Pain ' by Hamid A].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001446
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse