Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Yes
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
Yes
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
Yes
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
Yes
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
No
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
Yes
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
No
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
No
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
No
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
Yes
Other Comments:
1. Material nad methods requires more elaborate mention of randamization/ blinding and statistical tools used.
2. The discussion should be more explanatory, comparing and discussing a few more relevant studies.
Competing interests: None
Invited by the author to review this article? : No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
Quite many years.
How to cite: Mishra L D.Lumbar Facet Joint Infiltration in Post Laminectomy Pain[Review of the article 'Lumbar Facet Joint Infiltration in Post Laminectomy Pain ' by Hamid A].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001446
1. Material nad methods requires more elaborate mention of randamization/ blinding and statistical tools used.
2. The discussion should be more explanatory, comparing and discussing a few more relevant studies.
None
No
No
None
Quite many years.