Submited on: 23 Jan 2012 06:47:46 PM GMT
Published on: 24 Jan 2012 06:24:53 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The authors presented an interesting clinical scenario with good figures. However, the article references were writted in a few different styles. The authors should use a consistent referencing style. It will improve the the quality of the paper.

  • Competing interests:
    None
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Good

  • How to cite:  Chai F .The authors should employ consistent referencing style[Review of the article 'Non-Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve During Thyroid Surgery ' by Sampatkumr P].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001437
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Good photos but no originality
Posted by Prof. Pietro G Calo on 25 Jan 2012 02:31:02 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Partly
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This article is brief and illustrate a clinical case. It's not an original observation, but the photos are good and interesting

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Good

  • How to cite:  Calo P G.Good photos but no originality[Review of the article 'Non-Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve During Thyroid Surgery ' by Sampatkumr P].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001429
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Not a novel report.
Posted by Dr. Kavin G Shah on 24 Jan 2012 07:45:14 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Partly
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The presence of a non-recurrent laryngeal nerve, although rare, is well-documented in the literature. Furthermore, any qualified head and neck surgeon is aware of this anatomic abnormality and thus is always on the look-out during sub-total or total thyroidectomies. 

     

    The authors present one case, and a rather straightforward occurence with no further findings. There are no intra-op pictures to aid the case report. 

     

    The quality of the case report is sub-adequate, and should be redone with particular attention to grammar. 

  • Competing interests:
    No.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Reviews of other cases and manuscripts.

  • How to cite:  Shah K G.Not a novel report.[Review of the article 'Non-Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve During Thyroid Surgery ' by Sampatkumr P].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001426
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Interesting case presentation, well written with good figures

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    General surgeon with experience in thyroid surgery

  • How to cite:  Kornprat P .Non-Recurrent Laryngeal nerve during thyroid surgery[Review of the article 'Non-Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve During Thyroid Surgery ' by Sampatkumr P].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001425
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse