Submited on: 21 Jan 2012 03:26:10 PM GMT
Published on: 22 Jan 2012 08:34:42 AM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The authors presented an interesting case of fungal infection that leads to toe destruction. The report is well written.

  • Competing interests:
    Nil
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Has experience in writing case reports.

     

  • How to cite:  Chai F .An unsual case of fungal infection that leads to toe destruction[Review of the article 'Fungal Osteomyelitis Involving the Great Toe ' by Rao B H A].WebmedCentral 2012;3(3):WMCRW001599
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Fungal Osteomyelitis involving the great toe
Posted by Prof. Peter Kornprat on 24 Jan 2012 03:59:11 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The authors report on fungal osteomyelitis involving the great toe. It is an interesting and rare presentation, the manuscript is well written and describes the topic adequate.

     

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    General surgeon with experience with this topic

  • How to cite:  Kornprat P .Fungal Osteomyelitis involving the great toe[Review of the article 'Fungal Osteomyelitis Involving the Great Toe ' by Rao B H A].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001422
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse