Submited on: 05 Jan 2012 04:39:59 PM GMT
Published on: 06 Jan 2012 02:45:26 PM GMT
 
Improving clinical practice in neurology
Posted by Ms. Holly Chinnery on 08 Jan 2012 04:38:21 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    I enjoyed the layout of this article.  It opens one's mind to reviewing literature other than use of the scientific approach. 

     

    Furthermore, it raises some interesting points as to the differences, and some underlying similarities to various cultural mechanisms.  

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Rehabilaition 

  • How to cite:  Chinnery H .Improving clinical practice in neurology[Review of the article 'Improving Clinical Practice in Neurology ' by Thompson S].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001349
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Improving clinical practice in neurology - review
Posted by Ms. Natalie Jones on 08 Jan 2012 12:32:22 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    I found this an interesting article that highlights difficulties in the UK and compares attitidues towards working in a European neighbouring country. I found the light-hearted approach amusing and welcomed. It was interesting also to read about and remind ourselves about the historical link with Charcot's founding past. I imagine it was an interesting journey in terms of knowledge as well as travel and look forward to reading about the author's research in neurology and Alzheimer's disease in the future. I am aware that the author is a leading edge in this field.

  • Competing interests:
    None.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Work in assiting rehabilitative regimens.

  • How to cite:  Jones N .Improving clinical practice in neurology - review[Review of the article 'Improving Clinical Practice in Neurology ' by Thompson S].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001345
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Is it a scientific article?
Posted by Prof. Prasunpriya Nayak on 07 Jan 2012 01:34:55 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? No
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? No
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? No
  • Other Comments:

    Not a scientific article. 

    The Abstract is a complete misrepresentation of the article. 

    No neurology related research is found in the article, not even aimed to do so. This is a description of travel experience only. 

  • Competing interests:
    Nil
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Nil

  • How to cite:  Nayak P .Is it a scientific article?[Review of the article 'Improving Clinical Practice in Neurology ' by Thompson S].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001343
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Inproving Clinical Practice in Neurology
Posted by Mr. Brian Thompson on 06 Jan 2012 06:36:59 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Avery interesting Article

  • Competing interests:
    None
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Assisting in reabilitation

  • How to cite:  Thompson B .Inproving Clinical Practice in Neurology[Review of the article 'Improving Clinical Practice in Neurology ' by Thompson S].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001340
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse