Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Yes
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
Yes
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
Yes
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
Yes
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
Yes
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
No
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
No
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
Yes
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
Yes
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
Yes
Other Comments:
The sentence "At this point of time, the digital support of the posteriorly placed middle finger... ", needs to be rewritten. It is confusing and difficult to understand.
Competing interests: None
Invited by the author to review this article? : Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
None
How to cite: Campos J .ETView: Videoscopic Digital Intubation and Near-Perfect Intubation Device [Review of the article 'ETView: Videoscopic Digital Intubation and Near-Perfect Intubation Device ' by Gupta D].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001336
The sentence "At this point of time, the digital support of the posteriorly placed middle finger... ", needs to be rewritten. It is confusing and difficult to understand.
None
Yes
No
None
None