WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Submited on: 02 Dec 2011 05:32:08 PM GMT

Published on: 03 Dec 2011 08:05:24 PM GMT

Posted by Dr. H A Ugboma on 09 Dec 2011 10:15:49 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	No
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	Yes
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
Title: A word is missing(underlined). The influence of

Abstract: Under methods, spelling of Gardnerella is wrong. Under results, nothing is said about educational status which is the focus of the study.

Introduction: A word is missing in line 10. Cervical cytology has been found to be very helpful. See underlined.

Materials/Methods: Line 14 is an incomplete sentence.
Competing interests:
None
Invited by the author to review this article? :
Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
Yes
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

Similar.
How to cite: Ugboma H A.The influence of educational status on genital tract infections[Review of the article 'The Influence Educational Status on Genital Tract Infections ' by Nggada H].WebmedCentral 2011;2(12):WMCRW001223

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse