Submited on: 27 Nov 2011 05:07:56 PM GMT
Published on: 28 Nov 2011 05:22:07 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This paper puts a light on an old problem that has been negleted by almost all dermatologists in developing countries.

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I have been working on sexula transmitted diseases for many years.

  • How to cite:  Bedin V .A new therapeutic scheme in non and gonococcical urethritis with moxifloxacin[Review of the article 'A New Therapeutic Scheme in Non- and Gonococcical Urethritis with Moxifloxacin ' by Shtilionova S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(12):WMCRW001189
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Partly
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? No
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    I think this paper is very short and lack coherence.

    There is  a lot of spelling errors.

    There is no referencing inside the paper itself and no examples of any other studies that has been carried out in regard.

     

    Also the references is outdated.

     

    Regards

     

  • Competing interests:
    none
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Yes i got experience dealing with such cases to some extent from my clinical works at the OPD.

  • How to cite:  Elghblawi E .A New Therapeutic Scheme in Non- and Gonococcical Urethritis with Moxifloxacin [Review of the article 'A New Therapeutic Scheme in Non- and Gonococcical Urethritis with Moxifloxacin ' by Shtilionova S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(11):WMCRW001172
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse